There were 2.24 million injuries due to motor vehicle accidents in the United States in 2010, with human error largely to blame. Alcohol, distracted driving (texting/eating/talking), and driver decision error (speeding/driving aggressively/misjudgment of road conditions) account for over 85% of all accidents. A total of 35,332 lives were lost that year due to motor vehicle accidents, which is more than triple the amount of people lost to homicide involving a firearm. Google is hoping to make the streets a bit safer by introducing a car that can drive by itself. Initially, 100 prototype subcompact vehicles will be released and they could be ready to hit the road in less than a year.
The vehicle looks very similar to two-passenger subcompact “smart cars” currently on the market, but there are some distinct noticeable differences: no steering wheel or pedals to accelerate/decelerate. Human drivers actually play a very small role in operating the vehicle. To operate the car, the passenger merely presses a button to start the car and then inputs the destination into the car’s computer that utilizes Google Maps. The car does the rest. However, there is an emergency break available, to be used if necessary.
On top of the car, a sensor spins around that actively monitors surroundings in all directions over 180 meters (0.1 mile) away. The car’s computer gains information through both laser and radar sensors and will take camera data into account as well. This feature eliminates blind spots, making intersections and changing lanes in traffic much safer.
The first cars manufactured by Google will not be commercially available, but will be used purely for research purposes. The car currently tops out at 40 km/h (25 mph) as a safety measure. The vehicles also don’t have many comfort features to speak of, unless you count seat belts and leg room as “features” (I don’t). However, the less time Google spends installing cup holders and Bluetooth connectivity, the more time they will have to study how the car operates in a real setting and can move on to applying it to larger, more practical cars.
The electric car has a foam-like material for the body and uses a flexible, plastic windshield. The body of the front of the car has been molded to resemble a cartoony face, which we can only hope is temporary during this learning phase and will not be on those vehicles eventually put on the market.
Imagine how a morning commute would change if there was extra time to read or eat in the car on the way to work and how much faster the ride would be without preventable accidents causing congestion? The average American has a commute of 25 minutes and about 8% of people spend over an hour in the car every day just to get to work. Even on the lower end, a driverless car could provide over 200 hours of personal time in a year that could be spent reading books instead of staring at tail lights.
Self-driving cars could also be beneficial to those who cannot drive regular cars due to advanced age, vision impairments, or certain medical conditions. Depending on what happens with regulations, it could also be used by someone under the age of 16.
Google has actually been utilizing driverless cars for quite some time to collect data for Google Maps, though those vehicles have been modified pre-existing cars with a driver in the front seat just in case. The first vehicles manufactured by Google will also feature a safety driver initially as well. Over the next few years, they hope to introduce a small number of vehicles the way they are intended to be run in California, and then expanding operations if and when it is appropriate to do so.
Of course, there are concerns when looking at a future of self-driving cars. It may threaten the jobs of those who drive taxis/buses/limousines and increase suburban sprawl, as many may be more willing to move away from the city and commute, if the commute would be shorter and less stressful. Additionally, there are some legal aspects to be sorted. While these cars do have the potential to make our lives considerably safer, the threat of an accident will always be present. A pedestrian could easily step off the curb in front of the car, which may not have enough time to stop. There is not a clear-cut answer of who would be at fault in that scenario. Additionally, the cars would likely track data regarding crashes, but how much else would it store? Insurance companies that would require data related to the crash may have access to unrelated, private information.
What is normal? I wish I knew. I am on a never ending journey to find the true meaning of normal. I seek it at home, at work, and at play. The world seems to be a weird and strange place, with abnormal as the new normal. But here, we set the rules. We determine what is and isn't normal. We can add our 2-cents on any or every topic. Come join us on our journey. We can have a lot of fun looking at the world differently.
Jan 19, 2015 0Summary: This watch is what I refer to as a concept watch. I use that term to describe the watch as you would use the terms dress, sport, or diver. I think it is a very exclusive category and there are not that many watches that fall into the category of concept. I’m undecided if […]
Mar 29, 2015 0Indiana is in the middle of a well deserved firestorm this week for their incredibly shitty Senate Bill 101, otherwise known as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and otherwise known as the “Turn Away The Gays” bill. Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, who must realize he is basically...